I’ve heard a little about the book – only really so much as have ‘seen it around online’.
They have a chapter free up online. I was genuinely interested so I had a read – now, look I kind of a little bit get what their doing, but it feels rather semantical, and the first chapter was rather flat.
They seem to be still looking at issues of morals as defining imperatives in following Jesus?
And I had to laugh about the whole ’emergent pastors look cool’ thing…
What I want to know, is did they set out to find the holes? Knowing myself, I can usually find or make something exist like that if I’m trying to.
Regardless of the angle you’re coming from, this type of thing pisses me off as much as it pisses me off when my package lecturer slags off other universities.