Category: <span>Christianity</span>

designI’ve been reading this blog: In His Courts, lately. I first came across it when Makeesha commented on a post of mine on Advoc8.

It’s probably not the best time to link to it (due to the small proportion of younger readers and in fact the larger population of readers like me who are not married) BUT she does say some good stuff on Church, Christianity, culture… and I’m going to forget later on.

And while I was link hopping, I found FreeDerekWebb.com, it’s interesting concept and you can get some music out of it, I have yet to really listen to it but who knows… might hit on a winner?

While I’m at it, lots of the little design things I use to make these posts more interesting (In case my writing fails to suffice) come from Print&Pattern.

Blogging Christianity General

personTime Magazine has an interesting article on Youth Ministry.

Read it here

Over my holidays (which clearly aren’t here yet, because I’m procrastinating studying for my exam) I’ve had a book sitting on my shelf for a few months now about ‘Engaging the Soul of Youth Culture’. I intend to read it and have a bit more a think about some of this stuff.

Christianity General Ministry

eBecause you haven’t seen a post for OH SO LONG. I’d like to introduce you to a new word, (Well it was new for me and it doesn’t look all that common). I am enough of a word freak to actually subscribe to dictonary.com Word of the Day. Trusty Google Reader (although I’m still considering the ‘trusty’ definition) spat out this one sometime in the last 24 hours.

virtu: love of or taste for fine objects of art; also, productions of art.

Throw an ‘e’ on the end and you know what it means, remove the e and the actuality of the thing can go vastly downhill.

Let me provide an example:

This evening I had the pleasure experience of watching The Piano. The producers/directors/scriptwriters… yes it was a combined effort, successfully managed to extract the ‘e’ off of virtue. The movie is a fine piece of art but not exactly a fine piece of “moral excellence”.

The same could apply to Children of Men (Which I saw yesterday and did very much enjoy). The plot is gloriously intriguing, but some of the visuals far from peaceful and long way from right.

It is NOT a hard and fast rule, beautiful pieces of art do not have to be risque or downright crude. It is a totally exclusive variable, which really makes it not a variable at all.

Movies have ratings for a reason. I do just wonder though if over time the ratings have eased off in some kind of strange adaption to our ever desensitising hearts and minds.

Should we as Christians only take our virtu with an ‘e’? Only fill the eyes of whatever bodily and spiritual part of us with, “..whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable…excellent or praiseworthy…” – Philippians 4:8?

And then how does watching say, World News fit into that?

You cannot pretend that violence, that war, that rape, that crime, that abuse, that injustice doesn’t happen. It does.

And so clearly we cannot ignore that.
I understand that there is quite an extreme surface difference to watching something for entertainment and something that confrontly real, but honestly – how often do those lines blur?

We go mental at a group of school boys that filmed an abuse and sold it for entertainment. Rightly so. Yet don’t we see some watery alternate version of it on a daily basis?

How much of watching the news is because we actually care? How much is simply because we’re interested and intrigued and ‘need to be informed’? For what purpose? Does that make it entertainment?

I don’t have to enjoy a movie for it to be a diversion. Which is really what entertainment is.

I’m not prescribing that we turn off the television, the news, the movie… I don’t know.

Some of it comes back to motive.

Is there any clear or reasonable reason at all to watch a violent or a less than perfectly moral movie? (And that doesn’t leave you with much choice). Art? Yay? Nay? What if you sift the wheat from chaff? Does it even count? Does it even matter?

You cannot isolate yourself away from things, nor should you really intentionally fill your mind with images that you’ll regret (strongly or even passively) later on.

What is it to be in the world but not of it?

Surely it’s a fascinating pattern. How often do we drag that verse out of it’s context? What is it’s context? Offering myself as a living sacrifice? Loving. What is our emphasis?

Why do some Christians respond with more passion to ‘one of us’ swearing more than they do thousands of us hurting?

We are disfunctionally desensitised.

Art. Life. Art a reflection of what is really going on. Is art simply a manipulation? We feel. We are made to feel.

There is nothing wrong with feeling.

If art is manipulation, how can we use it in a positive way? And is that okay anyway?

more reading:

*Appologies, comments have now been closed as this post is continuously spammed and I’m getting sick of moderating them.

Christianity General Movies Photography Social Justice

cheetahI hate the phrase, “From the mouths of babes”.

I went to help out at Terry’s Tucker Kids (which from now shall be simply referred to as Terry’s) tonight before young adults. Perhaps not the most wonderful of motives in going – to feel like I’d done something a little useful with my day but hey, I quite enjoy the change of pace and Narelle (the kids pastor) is worth getting to know a bit more.

So I was chatting with one of the girls who was carrrying a plastic cheetah around all evening and asking some silly kid type questions about what it’s name was blah de blah blah.

Then I asked where the cheetah’s home was.
She gave me a funny look and said in a very cute voice, “With me of course!”

God gave me a nudge or some kind of small wallop.

We should definitely take more time out to listen to kids.

Christianity Church General Ministry

shead-garry-the-supper.jpgRight.

I’ve had sites bookmarked for a month now and empty promises and half finished thoughts. I’ve read a book and even experienced some of that play out. It is time to write this post or to put something down so I can stop pretending I’ve forgotten about it.

I am a HUGE fan of community. When it works. When it exists in a psuedo state, I’m no fan at all. It’s probably safe to say we all want close relationships or some idealised fashion of the sort, even if it only plays out in our head.

So of the collection of ‘data’ that I’ve picked up over the last while, and to make this happen I’ll present it and perhaps throw in a few thoughts of my own.

So, from the community minded book: The Different Drum: Community Making and World Peace by M. Scott Peck.

“If we are going to use the word (community) more meaningfully we must restrict it to a group of individuals who have learned how to communicate honestly with each other, whose relationships go deeper than their masks of composure, and who have developed some significant commitment to “rejoice together, mourn together,” and to “delight in eachother, make other’ conditions out own.” – (Peck,p59)

The book then also goes on to talk about inclusivity, commitment and consensus.

I’ve journied a fair bit in around and through community that exists for the long term, the short term and that which is simply intensified in a night (pick a camp experience, most of you have had them).

Out of curiousity and finally having a search function that works – some of my past posts and thoughts on community have said much of what I’ve wanted to say already.

A question of community
Striped Pyjamas (if you can wade through everything else there)

“When its death has been completed, open and empty, the group enters community. In this final stage a soft quietness descends. It is a kind of peace. The room is bathed in peace. Then, quietly, a member begins to talk about herself. She is being very vulnerable. She is speaking of the deepest part of herself. The group hangs on each word. No one realised she was capable of such eloquence.

When she is finished there is a hush. It goes on a long time. But it does not seem long. There is no uneasiness in this silence. Slowly out of the silence, another member begins to talk. He too is speaking very deeply, very personally, about himself. He is not trying to respond to her. It’s not about she but he who is the subject. Yet the other members of the group do not sense he has ignored her. What they feel is that it is as if he is laying himself down next to her on an altar…

…If it is so channeled, life in community may touch upon something perhaps even deeper than joy. There are a few who repeatedly seek out brief experiences of community as if such episodes were some sort of ‘fix’. This is not to be decried. We all need ‘fixes’ of joy in our lives. But what repeatedly draws me into community is something more. When I am with a group of human beings commited to hanging in there through both the agony and the joy of community, I have a dim sense that I am participating in a phenomenon for which there is only one word. I almost hesitate to use it. The word is “glory”.” -M Scott Peck

I’ve had the parallel experience to the above. It is beyond astounding. At the moment I am trying to see and perhaps in my own underhand kind of way, drive (a little) and be a part of a community where this is an on going thing. Intensity is marvellous, but you can’t live that way or it becomes ordinary.

I have the joy (perhaps?) of being in a group where it is becoming more and more tangible to live out community realistically. Yes, it’s on and off. We do ‘forget’ about each other a little and sometime ignore it throught the week, we could push for more openness but it’s pretty decent.

A friend of mine describes it thus,

“To me community is really based around one key thing… mutual, non-possessive love.”

and further,

“I’m just a genuine, affectionate, and engaging human being (on a good day). I connect with people (again on a good day… somedays I must hurt people heaps coz I miss it). It doesn’t take much more than sincerity and kindness to make an impact on someone emotionally. All of us have our pain and our loneliness… and anything that distracts us from that is appealing.”

Which leads me to the next quote I earmarked,

“Let us, at all times, take each the burden of the other, and let us suffer for each other even as our Lord suffered for us; but let us examine our souls unceasingly.”
The Paradise of the Fathers.

I have noticed, it might be pretty simplistic. But if a friend is in some way ‘suffering’, having a crap day, month, era – then the impact upon me is a good guage personally about how valuable they are to me. Selfish – yes, pathetic – most certainly. There are lines you have to draw about how emotionally involved you get with someones ‘issues’, which is why I like the latter part of the quote. But the whole deal is pretty self explanatory this is something that should – without even us trying, play out in a community.

And to finish of this very very scattered post,

“Congregations should not be viewed as a group of people who gather together for an hour or two each week. Rather, he says, they should be viewed as a federation of teams – people who support and encourage one another as they live out their faith commitment and minister to the people they are in contact with…ministry and mission flow out of relationships.”  (Leadership Next 37)

Church and community should parallel – infact, be one and the same. Size determines a lot, but effective close relationships across a wider spectrum is definitely possible. I don’t think we should restrict our ideas of community to say, ‘just my young adults group’. A peer-only society doesn’t exist. It’s working out how to break a few links on this far simpler method of like being drawn to like. How that eventuates, I’m not quite sure.

Christianity Church General Relationships